翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ State University Railroad ・ State university system ・ State University System of Florida ・ State University System of Florida Libraries ・ State University, India ・ State Urban Search and Rescue Alliance ・ State v. Allen ・ State v. Anderson ・ State v. Dalton ・ State v. Ebrahim ・ State v. Elliott ・ State v. Henry ・ State v. Katz ・ State v. Kelly ・ State v. Levie ・ State v. Limon ・ State v. Mitchell ・ State v. Palendrano ・ State v. Quattlebaum ・ State v. Reid ・ State v. Stone ・ State v. Strasburg ・ State v. Yanz ・ State variable ・ State variable filter ・ State vector ・ State vector (geographical) ・ State Veterinary Service ・ State visit ・ State Water Register Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク State v. Limon ： ウィキペディア英語版 State v. Limon ''State v. Limon'' (280 Kan. 275, 122 P.3d 22) is a 2005 Kansas Supreme Court case in which a state law allowing for lesser punishment for statutory rape convictions if the partners were of different sexes than if they were of the same sex was found unconstitutional under both the federal and Kansas state constitutions. It was among the first cases to cite the United States Supreme Court decision ''Lawrence v. Texas'' as precedent, months after the Virginia Supreme Court did similarly in ''Martin v. Ziherl''. ==Background== In February 2000, a week after his eighteenth birthday, Kansas resident Matthew R. Limon engaged in a consensual act of oral sex with a 14-year-old boy. The difference in their ages at the time of the act was three years, one month and a number of days. Under the state's Romeo and Juliet law (K.S.A. § 21-3522), the penalties for statutory rape are less severe if the incident involves two teenagers. The Kansas statute specifically excluded same-sex sexual conduct.〔K.S.A. § 21-3522 as passed by the Kansas Legislature reads "(a) Unlawful voluntary sexual relations is engaging in voluntary: (1) sexual intercourse; (2) sodomy; or (3) lewd fondling or touching with a child who is 14 years of age but less than 16 years of age and the offender is less than 19 years of age and less than four years of age older than the child and child and the offender are the only parties involved and are members of the opposite sex."〕 Because of this exclusion, Limon was charged under K.S.A. § 21-3505(a)(2) with criminal sodomy. Limon's attorneys filed a pretrial motion to dismiss the charges, arguing that K.S.A. § 21-3522 was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it discriminated on the basis of sex and sexual orientation. The motion was denied and Limon was convicted of criminal sodomy. He was sentenced to 17 years and two months in prison. Had the sexual encounter been between a male and female, the maximum sentence would have been 15 months. Limon was also required to register as a sex offender and to submit to five years of supervision upon release.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「State v. Limon」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.